A study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine found that people who cooked at home six or more times per week had significantly higher Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores than those who cooked at home no more than three times per week. Conversely, those who ate outside more than three times per week had significantly
lower HEI scores (and these eating sessions included all types of restaurants).
The participants in the study were the primary food shoppers for their families, were 21-55 years old, and 70% were women. They reported on the weekly frequency of cooking dinner at home versus frequency of eating out, completed food frequency questionnaires, and provided information on socioeconomic characteristics.
The report says that cooking dinners at home may be an effective strategy to reduce the consumption of empty calories and improve diet quality within the budget--and they also suggest that efforts should be made to target such meals as a way to improve Americans' diet quality.
There's No Place Like Home?
On the other hand, home cooking has many variations, and it certainly has morphed during the past decades. As we commented in a past blog, the digital wave has put a new wrinkle in the concept of “gathering around the family table.”
The sanctity of the family dinner
table received several tweaks lately. A Taiwanese company makes a table with the
food heating component in the middle, and the unit will only warm the items if diners place their smartphones in an attached tray. An Australian device is a
bit sneakier—a covert switch is hidden inside a pepper grinder, and with a surreptitious toggle, phone reception at the table is blocked.
Even though many think digital
devices have ruined the ambience of the family meal, these solutions could
cause some indigestion. Imagine that moment when a teen’s Instagram app goes
blank. Susie looks up from her screen and says, “Hey, who’s that kid sitting at
the end of the table?”
Her mom sets the pepper grinder down and replies, “That’s
your eight-year-old brother. Be nice to him—he’s distraught because his Angry
Birds game just fizzled on his screen. By the way, his name is Dennis.”
Aside from loud complaints and
awkward getting-to-know-you scenes, these blank screens might show us how much
things have changed from the days when we supposedly ate as if we were posing
for a Norman Rockwell painting. Nowadays in most households, food is faster,
schedules are more hectic, and various media outlets are more intrusive.
Then again, we need to be careful
what we wish for. A recent article about the “The History of the Family Dinner in America,”
points out that the Leave It to Beaver
meal gathering developed over decades and mainly worked for Americans who
actually had a table, a “dining room,” and a set time to eat. The expected
values included the need to be “agreeable, pious, and unified.” This 50s instructional video provides a disturbing look at how far some stressed the
rigidity of the “ideal family setting.” The 60s changed much of that scene, but
that's another story.
Nearing 90 years of age, my parents
still live on the home farm, and I’m pleased to say several generations still
gather around their kitchen table at regular intervals. We talk, laugh, joke,
and only use smartphones to settle important disputes. “Ha, I was right. Ray
Bolger--not Jack Haley--played the scarecrow on The Wizard of Oz. Ah, if you only had a brain!”
Then again we were never the Cleaver
family—even in the late 50s. Dad did not wear a suit and tie to the meal. Most
farmers just made sure the straps of their bib overalls were fastened. And if
anyone at the table was “wired,” it was Dad. His transistor radio gave him the
grain market reports and the essential weather forecasts. "Quiet, they're
stating the pork belly prices."
Mom was just as nice as June
Cleaver, but I’m sure she was a better cook. That could be because The Beaver's
mom apparently spent the day fixing her hair and ironing the dress she would
wear to the meal. Mom spent most of her time keeping us three boys in line. We
were raised on the Lone Ranger and Looney Tunes, so we seldom hit the “pious”
or “agreeable” standards. But we were unified in our quest to have fun, so the
family meal might include kicking under the table, Three Stooges quips, and
food flicking at a brother when the folks weren’t looking. A normal meal had a
spilled glass of milk and somebody’s sleeve in the gravy.
Mom and Dad have turned the family
table into a social magnet—a place for kids of all ages to “gather around the
feeding trough” and have a good time. But during that era when we boys were
doing Spanky and Our Gang impersonations, Mom probably wished
smartphones would have been around to keep us calm. That hidden switch in the
pepper grinder would have stayed off, and she could power herself down to enjoy
the family meal.
by dan gogerty (top pic from acsh.com, middle pic from
firstwefeast.com, and bottom pic from lessonbucket.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment